![]() ![]() Land grabbing, even when practiced at the local level, has global ramifications, which have been most profound in the modern era. In most instances, the land acquisition was met with condemnation as it often occurred in countries whose citizens relied on food donations. Countries that were selected as ideal candidates were African, Asian and South American countries. Therefore, these countries had to source for arable land in countries with high agricultural potential to meet the food deficit at home. Food production in many of these countries is restricted by natural factors such as the size of arable land, soils and weather conditions. ![]() The impact of the skyrocketing food prices was most felt in countries with large populations such as India, China, Indonesia, and Japan. Land grabbing has been practiced throughout human history but experienced its peak in the wake of the 2008 global food price crisis, when food production plummeted globally, sending the food prices to unprecedented highs. For instance, the definition does not encapsulate the legality and structure of the acquisition and does not outline the stakeholder’s involvement and their respective roles. However, this definition of the term is not universally accepted, with scholars around the world pointing out numerous flaws in the definition. The phrase “large tracts of land” relates to land with an area exceeding 390 square miles or 0.25 million acres. Land grabbing is defined as the acquisition of large tracts of land either through purchase or lease. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |